Understanding the technique
Combines the likelihood of equipment failure with its potential consequences to prioritize inspection effort. A structured review connects damage mechanisms, process conditions, inspection history and business exposure.
Where it adds value
Pressure vessels, process piping, storage tanks and fixed equipment in production and processing facilities.
The purpose is to provide evidence that supports a defined asset decision: prioritizing maintenance, investigating degradation, assessing serviceability or documenting equipment condition. The examination is planned around the asset's operating context and the information needed by the owner.
Inspection outputs
An equipment risk register, inspection priorities and a proposed plan defining methods, coverage and review intervals.
Planning considerations
Reliable asset and process data are essential. Reassess the plan when operating conditions, inspection findings or equipment configuration change.
From scope to decision
Provide equipment identification, drawings, material details, operating conditions and previous inspection records where available.
Confirm the inspection objective, accessible locations, coverage, acceptance basis, site arrangements and reporting requirements.
Review recorded findings against the agreed scope, identify any coverage limitations and define the need for further inspection or engineering assessment.
Project questions
What information helps define a quotation?
Share the asset type, location, quantity, inspection objective and desired schedule. Drawings, previous reports and access information help the team prepare a realistic scope.
Can this technique be combined with other services?
Yes. Complementary examination or engineering assessment may be needed to characterize relevant findings. The combination depends on damage mechanisms, material, geometry and the decision required.